[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Don Park" <donpark@docuverse.com>
- To: <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 28 Nov 1999 03:15:18 -0800
Since there have been some concerns about the name EBNF rule,
I thought the topic deserves a separate thread.
XML's Name production rule is rather hairy. Just looking at
the production rules for components of Name (BaseChar,
Ideographic, CombiningChar, Digit, Extender)is enough to give
one headaches. XML parsers I have seen uses the target
platform's Unicode support to deal with it. I doubt one
can rely on all SML platforms to have such support.
The question is this: do we support i18n names and if so
do we follow the path taken by XML or open it up to make
implementation easier? By opening it up, I mean excluding
only the reserved characters ('<', '>', '&', etc.) and
whitespace characters.
Best,
Don Park - mailto:donpark@docuverse.com
Docuverse - http://www.docuverse.com
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
