[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Len Bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
- To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 18:18:24 -0600
Tim Berners-Lee wrote:
>
> It is now appropriate for any group developing a W3C xml application (such
> as P3P, xHTML, etc) to use namespaces and schemas. These should be seen as
> the first, very important, test cases for schema: if xml-schema language
> won't do what you want it to do, then get it fixed.
Excellent.
> Working across more groups takes time but it leads to a consistent result.
> Let's make sure everything fits together at this stage!
How can a namespace enable us to discover a record of authority by
which we may determine which variant or subset of the definition
is in effect for some time slice of a process?
It is important because we will not have a single definition for
some processes which may think to name within a single standard.
For example, the timing models or concepts of SMIL and VRML may
not be compatible although they do overlap considerably. We
require a means to diffentiate the non-compatible models.
len bullard
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|