[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: 20 Nov 1999 08:14:08 -0500
Sean McGrath <digitome@iol.ie> writes:
> Any SML doc is an XML doc but not the other way around.
>
> SML < XML < SGML
That gets you into the subset dilemma: all conformant XML processors
will be able to handle SML, but not all conformant SML processors will
be able to handle XML.
Perhaps it's worth the cost, and perhaps not -- that's up to you guys
(and, eventually, the market) to decide -- but there *is* a cost.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
