Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: "'XML Dev'" <email@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 01:14:09 -0500
Don Park wrote:
> I am now leaning very heavily toward focusing SML on XML fragments
> so that SML data (the word 'document' is not in the SML draft spec)
> starts with the 'content' production rule of the XML spec. No
> prolog, no misc. ...
What's interesting is that one of the major reasons for introducing "Namespaces"
was fragments, yet Namespaces' complexity is the largest cause of this hubbub
Take a look at Canonical XML <http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-c14n>. Look at all how
*all* the constructs are represented, then compare all of them put together with
just how Namespaces alone are represented.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)