Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Sean Mc Grath <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 10:46:30 +0000
>If 0% of SGML is TEXT then 4% seems useful enough. <g> Frankly,
>I am still not sure if SML has enough momentum to fly. I am
>just talking the talk and walking the walk to see if where it
>leads. Ideas tend to have a mind of its own.
Unfortunately, 0% of SGML is completely incompatible
with 0.1% of SGML. Same goes for XML.
What I mean is that plan text is not a subset
of SGML or XML. If XML is the new ASCII wouldn't
it be great if it was backwardly compatible with
the existing ASCII?
To be concrete. I think it makes a lot of sense
to allow a plain text document to parse and
emerge at the far end of an XML processor
as a single xml:text node consisting
>From a software development perspective this
appeals to be. I make text processing tools
such as, say, XML-aware search tools, yet
know that I can use em to process plain
text without any code changes.
Developers Day co-Chair WWW9, April 2000, Amsterdam
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)