[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Don Park" <donpark@docuverse.com>
- To: <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 15:23:56 -0800
>Funnily enough, if you go back 3 years, and substitute "SGML" for
>"XML" and "XML" for "SML", you get the discussions many of us
>were having about why XML was an advantage over SGML...
>mostly, that XML was what most people thought SGML was, or
>should have been.
>
>So SML is 20% of 20% of SGML? Hmmm, does 4% of SGML
>deliver 64% of the usefulness?
If 0% of SGML is TEXT then 4% seems useful enough. <g> Frankly,
I am still not sure if SML has enough momentum to fly. I am
just talking the talk and walking the walk to see if where it
leads. Ideas tend to have a mind of its own.
Best,
Don Park - mailto:donpark@docuverse.com
Docuverse - http://www.docuverse.com
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
