OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Application profiles Re: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]
  • From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
  • To: "'xml-dev@ic.ac.uk'" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
  • Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 10:28:35 -0700

In my post on the XHTML 1.0 returning to HTML WG thread.  I said some things
from the hip that I have now rethought.

Basically, I think my original statements that the controversy was due to
misusing namespaces to indicate a particular profile of capabilities of a
processor was correct and that there has not been a good generic XML
solution to indicate what capability profiles that a document conforms to.

I had suggested that this seemed to be a clear case of trying to communicate
a hint to the eventual processor (which I still believe) and that seemed to
be an appropriate use of a Processing Instruction (which I have rethought).
The problems with using a PI is that it is not scoped (generic XML problem)
and that it would be displayed by existing some HTML processors.

How about defining a profiles attribute for the html element that is a space
delimited list of uri's that identify the application profiles that the html
element adheres to?  URI's could be established that indicate the three
application profiles that correspond with frameset, strict and transitional.
These URI's would be like namespaces in that they do not imply that their is
a resource associated with that URI that can be used to validate whether the
element adheres to that profile.

So you end up with three loosely coupled declarations:

1) A Document Type Declaration that indicates a resource that can be used to
validate the document.  Three distinct DTD's could be published
corresponding to three proposed namespaces.
2) One Namespace URI that identifies the specific tags as to be interpreted
in the XHTML namespace
3) Declarations that the html element adheres to zero or more specific
application profiles.

p.s. This suggested to me that it would be good to add types for space
delimited lists of non-space containing datatypes (reals, uris, integers,
decimals) to the list of built in types in XML Schemas.  Or to provide a
construct to define a datatype as a list of other datatypes.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS