[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Don Park" <donpark@docuverse.com>
- To: <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:26:15 -0800
>So as it stands, there will exist valid SML documents that are not well
>formed XML and will therefore trigger a fatal error if given to an XML
>parser.
I was talking about removing an error reporting requirement
because I believe XML WG went overboard with the error
reporting requirements which places a heavy burden on
the performance of XML parsers.
IMHO, HTML crowd got burnt badly with HTML's forgivable parsers
and over-reacted. There are other ways to solve this sort of
problems without resorting to high tariff on all.
Best,
Don Park - mailto:donpark@docuverse.com
Docuverse - http://www.docuverse.com
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
