Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <email@example.com>
- To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 10:35:19 -0500
From: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>There's another school which holds that "syntax IS semantics".
>A DTD for X.509 certificates allows me to express what parts of the
>certificate I consider required, what parts of the certificate I
>optional, as well as the legal forms of the parts themselves.
>I can tell whether or not a certificate is valid, and also *why* (e.g.
>signature algorithm name was provided, the "not after" date was
>I think that if I can answer "why" questions, I'm operating in the
>Meaning may only be conveyed (manifested?) in "running code or
>human-readable prose", but the meaning is latent in the syntax, and
>couldn't be conveyed if it wasn't already there.
You can tell if the "not after" date is valid or not (syntax), but you
can't tell for what reason it has been included at all, what role it
plays in the system (semantics). The meaning is not "latent in the
syntax" at all.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)