[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Len Bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
- To: Warren Hedley <w.hedley@auckland.ac.nz>
- Date: Mon, 08 Nov 1999 15:29:07 -0600
Warren Hedley wrote:
>
> Hi Gregg
>
> I faced the same problem as you 6 months ago (actually, I'm just
> ignoring it now), and had a look at the docbook DTD but found it
> too vast and complicated to follow initially. I ended up cutting
> out just the bibliography section for inclusion into my own DTDs.
Good approach. Question: is it a valid subset? Will any instance that
parses by this definition parse with the original?
How should an XML DTD designer signify that this DTD is a
conformant subset or a variant of a another DTD? Are
these one, two, or three namespaces IF a namespace identifier
resolves to a schema? This matters if the FPI is ROA for the
DTD and a label for the namespace identifier.
len
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
