[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- To: <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 14 Nov 1999 10:27:50 -0800
At 01:49 AM 11/14/99 -0000, Richard Anderson wrote:
>> It is not a "processing instruction"! It is a *declaration*!
>
>The XML declaration is an indication to the application processing the
>document as to what version of the XML spec the following markup conforms
>to, what encoding is used, and whether or not there are dependancies of
>external entites within the document.
This is true.
But it's my opinion that the XML decl is *not* a PI, for three reasons:
- it doesn't match production [17] because the target is 'xml'
- it doesn't match sections [22] and [27], which says that a PI
can only occur in the space starting *after* the XML declaration
- section 2.6 says "Processing instructions (PIs) allow documents to
contain instructions for applications. ". The XML decl contains
instructions for the XML processor which is carefully distinguished
from an application
But I think the spec probably should have had an explicit statement
saying that the XML decl either is or isn't a PI, because it admittedly
kind of walks, swims, and quacks like one. -Tim
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|