[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Pavel Velikhov <pvelikho@cs.ucsd.edu>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 13:42:07 -0800
"Clark C. Evans" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Joshua E. Smith wrote:
> > Sure, you can normalize this to:
> >
> > <Thing>
> > <Id>foo</Id>
> > </Thing>
> >
> > But, well.... yuck. This is just... strange.
> >
> > Doesn't it strike you as perverse to dive into the sub-elements of an
> > element to get a handle to the parent?
>
> Yes it does. It also requires that the _entire_ element be read
> in (till its end tag is encountered) just in the case that a child
> provides details which modify the parent -- in this case, the
> parent's identifier.
>
But every child provides details that modify the parent.
Consider this element:
<home>
<zip>91111</zip>
</home>
And then the following element:
<home>
<local_schools>
<school>S1</school>
<school>S2</school>
...
</local_schools>
</home>
Same problem here, right? Every child modifies the parent.
Should not these cases be all semantically equivalent?
Pavel Velikhov
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|