Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Tim Bray <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Richard Lanyon <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 09:40:34 -0800
At 12:30 PM 11/17/99 +0000, Richard Lanyon wrote:
>On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, James Clark wrote:
>> XML 1.0 DTD validation isn't very useful for the things
>> I'm interested in and I want to keep the code size small.
>It's not useful for our processing, either, but it's possible that some
>people might want our processor to tell them what's wrong with their XML
>before processing it.
I have often wondered where this myth arose that validating against a DTD
will tell you, in useful real-world terms, "what's wrong with your XML".
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)