[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 15:01:39 GMT
> I do not think it is superflous to allow ¤.
Given that this is defined to be the same as $ at the lowest level of xml
parsing, I can not see any reason why the arguments currently being
applied to get rid of attributes (which are nowhere nearly as closely
identified with the `equivalent' element markup) do not apply to this
case as well.
David
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: [SML]
- From: "Don Park" <donpark@docuverse.com>
|
