[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Don Park" <donpark@docuverse.com>
- To: <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:47:37 -0800
David,
>> I do not think it is superflous to allow ¤.
>
>Given that this is defined to be the same as $ at the lowest
>level of xml
>parsing, I can not see any reason why the arguments currently being
>applied to get rid of attributes (which are nowhere nearly as closely
>identified with the `equivalent' element markup) do not apply to this
>case as well.
Not allowing ¤ means:
1. SML parsers will have to check for it which
complicates implementation.
2. SML spec will have to explain it which
complicates the spec.
For above two reasons, I do think ¤ should
be allowed.
Does this answer your question?
Best,
Don Park - mailto:donpark@docuverse.com
Docuverse - http://www.docuverse.com
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
- References:
- RE: [SML]
- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
|
