Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <email@example.com>
- To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sat, 27 Nov 1999 14:59:22 +0800
From: Don Park <email@example.com>
>I believe it is now time to address the question of
>whether Attribute should be supported in SML or not.
Since you are not asking for use-cases, the only logic
driving SML is reductionism. The result can only
be a language with 1 encoding and 1 tag and the
minimum repertoire for names.
SML = (data | "<" ASCII* ">" SML "<" ASCII* ">" )*
Given this, discussion seems utterly futile.
If people are serious, they should first establish some use-cases
of where XML fails. This will also bring out the ramifications
In any case, it seems to me that reductionism and anti-reductionism
are often character traits rather than technical positions capable
of being debated. A reductionist will say "if attributes do not mean
something they mean nothing" while an anti-reductionist might
respond "it is a DTD/Schema function to allocate the particular
roles attributes/elements according to the methodology of the
DTD/schema designer: it is a source of richness for there to be
a syntactic disrinction which is methodogical neutral and available."
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)