xml-dev - Re: Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :)

Re: Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :)

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

From: "Richard Anderson" <rja@arpsolutions.demon.co.uk>
To: "David Megginson" <david@megginson.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 23:38:07 -0000

BTW, I noticed that the XML recs in XML have these two entities:

<!ENTITY xmlpio "'&lt;?xml'">
<!ENTITY pic    "'?>'">

XML Pi Open, XML Pi Close maybe ? 

: )


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :)
  - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>

References:
- Re: Separating documents in a stream
  - From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@netcom.com>
- Is the XML decl a PI ?
  - From: "Richard Anderson" <rja@arpsolutions.demon.co.uk>
- The XML decl is not a PI (especially in SAX)
  - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :)
  - From: "Richard Anderson" <rja@arpsolutions.demon.co.uk>
- Re: Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :)
  - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>

Prev by Date: Re: RDF-Schema (was Re: Why validate?)
Next by Date: Re: XML Memory Requirements (was Re: Feeling good about SML)
Previous by thread: RE: Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :)
Next by thread: Re: Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread