Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Sean McGrath <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1999 11:12:11 +0000
>The reason SGML has so many optional features is because there were so
>many people who just *had to have* something to make their life simpler.
>Everytime someone says "I don't like PIs" or "I don't like DTDs" or "I
>don't like external entities" or "I don't like non-ASCII" it raises the
>largely bogus spectre of XML 1.1 or XML 2,0 or whatever. It would be a
>sad day to see the SGML declaration reappear as XFM. I
Why would it be a sad day?
1) XML parsers differ in important ways
2) Knowing the differences is useful for XML developers
It seems to me to be a no-brainer to conclude:
3) Having an agreed upon way to document the differences
for both human and software consumption is useful.
Developers Day co-Chair WWW9, April 2000, Amsterdam
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)