Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: James Robertson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Sun, 14 Nov 1999 17:59:47 +1100
At 05:39 13/11/1999 , Steven R. Newcomb wrote:
>(I'm trying to think who defends XML from creeping scope. I should
>know the answer to that question, but I don't.)
After some of my (as usual) rabid posts attacking
creeping featurism in XML, I have received a number
of private responses encouraging me.
Let's just say that some of these hold respected
positions in the standards process ... :-)
The question is: why everyone is keeping their
heads down on this topic?
Just a small comment from one who would
like to drive a stake through the heart of
the current "standards" process, and get on
with real work.
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
"Beyond the Idea"
ACN 081 019 623
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)