[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Sean Mc Grath <digitome@iol.ie>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 17:36:19 +0000
>At 11:54 AM 11/16/99 +0000, Sean Mc Grath wrote:
>>I see this as nothing more than codifying existing
>>practice. There are lots of parsers that claim
>>to be XML parsers but when you look closely they
>>don't do X,Y and Z per the specification.
>
[Tim Bray]
>Is that really true?
I believe it is true but I would be delighted to
be wrong.
Does anyone knowledgeable in the minutia
of XML compliance care to list the extant
parsers and put them into fully XML 1.0
compliant and non-XML 1.0 compliant camps?
The next step would be to segregate the
XML 1.0 compliant parsers along the
lines of things they do that are
"optional" per the spec. that cause
interoperability problems.
regards,
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<p>
This document has three
erors.
/p>
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
