[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Hunter, David" <dhunter@Mobility.com>
- To: 'Tim Berners-Lee' <timbl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 12:09:34 -0500
Thank you for posting this here, Tim. Without getting into the "one vs.
three vs. none" debate [yet], I'm glad the issue will get more consideration
before the spec is "recommended", since the, ahem, heated debate never
really seemed settled to me.
I am also hoping, after reading the post by Ann Navarro, that a revised
version of the spec will be ready soon. Although I didn't want to see the
spec go on as it was, I also don't want it to be held up for a long time
either, because I think we all want XHTML to be successful, so that it can
take over for HTML as soon as possible. ;-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Berners-Lee [mailto:timbl@w3.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 1999 4:34 PM
To: xml-dev
Subject: Fw: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
FYI - tim
<big-snip/>
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
