[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- To: Richard Anderson <rja@arpsolutions.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1999 19:34:59 +0700
Richard Anderson wrote:
> > If you feel that one needs to be mandated, I would pick UTF-16.
>
> I second that. The Vivid Creation SAX interfaces
> http://www.vivid-creations.com/free/sax.h ) have been UTF-16 from day 1
> around 16 months ago ) and to date they've had nothing but positive
> feedback. I'd therefore make everything wchar_t and not char.
Unfortunately wchar_t isn't guaranteed to be UTF-16. Some platforms
make it 32-bits. However, I agree it's a good idea for SAXChar to be
typedefed to wchar_t on platforms where wchar_t is UTF-16.
James
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
