[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: 03 Dec 1999 14:07:32 +0100
>>>>> James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>:
> Richard Anderson wrote:
>> > If you feel that one needs to be mandated, I would pick UTF-16.
>>
>> I second that. The Vivid Creation SAX interfaces
>> http://www.vivid-creations.com/free/sax.h ) have been UTF-16 from day 1
>> around 16 months ago ) and to date they've had nothing but positive
>> feedback. I'd therefore make everything wchar_t and not char.
> Unfortunately wchar_t isn't guaranteed to be UTF-16. Some platforms
> make it 32-bits.
Yep! So I've heard.
Do you have a list of the ones that does this?
> However, I agree it's a good idea for SAXChar to be typedefed to
> wchar_t on platforms where wchar_t is UTF-16.
Hm... should we also to a
typedef basic_string<SAXChar> SAXstring;
(needs a better name, I lowercased the "s" in "string" to differ it
from SAXString)?
(pf course, then we would probably need SAXChar char_traits<> of some
sorts as well...)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
