[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: 03 Dec 1999 14:14:54 +0100
>>>>> James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>:
> - Would it be better to typedef SAXString to the Standard C++ string
> class (ie std::basic_string<SAXChar>)?
An argument for using
typdef const SAXChar* SAXString;
is that you get late construction of the basic_string<>, ie. you don't
create it until you have to (eg. when using it to do a lookup in an
STL map<>).
But ven if it's not used directly on the SAX interface, such a typedef
would be useful when handling the data (eg. for creating the above
mentioned map<>).
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
