[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com
- To: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- Date: Sat, 04 Dec 1999 14:16:01 -0700
> I'd like to hear what others think on this issue. There was some
> interest in SAX2 when I posted my alpha interfaces a few months back
> (most notably, but not exclusively, from David Brownell), but it was
> hardly a tidal wave. On the other hand, I am noticing a building
> pressure from implementors to get something out in C++.
Have you considered that the lack of heavy discussion after you posted the
SAX2 alpha was because of its high quality? There is little to argue with.
The Python/XML group was able to hammer out a Python binding based on your
alpha in short order. We have put this to practical use in 4XSLT, and it
works very well. I don't think there needs to be a lot more dicussion on the
way to SAX 2.0, but I hardly think that minimizes its importance.
--
Uche Ogbuji
FourThought LLC, IT Consultants
uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com (970)481-0805
Software engineering, project management, Intranets and Extranets
http://FourThought.com http://OpenTechnology.org
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
