[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no>
- Date: 06 Dec 1999 08:40:29 -0500
Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no> writes:
> >>>>> David Megginson <david@megginson.com>:
>
> > Actually, I don't see any strong argument not to provide empty inline
> > implementations for the handler callbacks:
>
> Inlined virtuals will cause an instantiation of the vtable and the
> function bodies in _every_ compilation unit the header file is
> included into (ref. Scott Meyers "More Effective C++", Item 24 pp
> 118).
>
> This is a size cost that can be easily avoided.
Thanks -- this is the kind of information I was looking for.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|