[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
- To: "Michael Fuller" <msf@mds.rmit.edu.au>,<lisarein@finetuning.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 22:07:50 -0500
Hi Michael,
Michael said:
Ok; the introduction to XPath also states:
"The primary syntactic construct in XPath is the expression. An
expression matches the production Expr. An expression is evaluated to
yield an object, which has one of the following four basic types:
* node-set (an unordered collection of nodes without duplicates)
[...other basic types...]
That enough?
Didier reply:
I guess that yes. And I guess that we should interpret it in such ways that
a node could be of any node type (since there is no explicit restrictions on
the node types). Thus, that a node-set is an unordered collection of nodes
without duplicates. And that the collection can contain any node type. Now,
I guess that the possible sequence of nodes depends on the particular
information set used. David, what are you doing, we need some precision from
you here or at least some indications that we are or not on the right track.
Many thanks to Lisa and Michael to help me clarify this stuff.
Cheers
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
