[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: John Aldridge <john.aldridge@informatix.co.uk>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 11:21:09 +0000
At 09:51 14/12/99 +0100, Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no> wrote:
>> So either it has to be wchar_t
>
>It has to be SAXChar, actually, since wchar_t will be 32bit on some
>platforms.
Why? What's wrong with storing UTF-16 encoded data in a 32 bit wchar_t? I
know it uses more storage space; but there won't typically be that much
data around in this format at once.
I'd much rather have the format defined to be wstring (or wchar_t*, if you
must, but that's another debate), because of the compatibility with wide
string literals.
--
Cheers,
John
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
