[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
- To: <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 19 Dec 1999 09:19:55 -0500
Hi Elliotte
Elliotte said:
While XMill sounds interesting, I really have to take issue with this
statement. I've seen no evidence that XML based, uncompressed file
formats are larger than the corresponding binary file formats. This
is a common fear about XML but I have not seen it borne out in my
tests. For instance, my 700K, very verbose baseball statistics
example is more than two megabytes in both FileMaker 3 and Microsoft
Excel.
Didier reply:
What??? no evidence???? come on Elliotte, this is a joke I presume, you're
not serious ;-) so there is a :-) missing at the end of the statement.
In fact, their compression algorithm is something that the HTTP group should
look very closely as an addition to simple zip compression (as you know HTTP
1.1 can transport content in a compressed format) for certain MIME types
such as XML derived domain languages.
Cheers
Didier PH Martin
----------------------------------------------
Email: martind@netfolder.com
Conferences: Web New York (http://www.mfweb.com)
Book to come soon: XML Pro published by Wrox Press
Products: http://www.netfolder.com
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
