[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: XMLDev list <xml-dev-digest@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 10:54:27 -0500 (EST)
Leigh Dodds writes:
> Couldn't there be a SAX2 Handler interface
>
> public interface Handler
> {
> }
>
> which marks a SAX2 Handler. The other handler interfaces are subclasses
> of this.
I proposed this originally last spring and it was roundly shot down.
If people are more comfortable with the idea, I'd be happy to add it
back in.
Giving a generic:
>
> public void setHandler(Handler handler, String identifier)
> throws SAXNotRecognizedException, SAXNotSupportedException;
>
> - identifiers for the standard handlers can be provided (e.g. as
> public final constants)
>
> - additional extended handlers use the same method to register, only
> using the appropriate URI identifier as you suggest.
>
> IMHO this is a cleaner way of registering handlers. I don't have to
> remember that one Handler is registered explicitly (setDTDHandler) and
> another through
> a setProperty call. A Handler isNotA property.
Hmm -- I don't know about this part. I think that it's still
convenient to have explicit setters for the core handler types.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|