[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@ingenta.com>
- To: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>, XMLDev list <xml-dev-digest@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 15:43:55 -0000
> public void setProperty (String property, Object value)
> throws SAXNotRecognizedException, SAXNotSupportedException;
> public Object getProperty (String property)
> throws SAXNotRecognizedException;
<snip!>
> 2. Extended handler types (for schemas, or what-have-you) can be set
> using the setProperty method with the appropriate URI identifier.
<snip!>
> 3. Should we just use setProperty to set the optional handlers?
Couldn't there be a SAX2 Handler interface
public interface Handler
{
}
which marks a SAX2 Handler. The other handler interfaces are subclasses
of this. Giving a generic:
public void setHandler(Handler handler, String identifier)
throws SAXNotRecognizedException, SAXNotSupportedException;
- identifiers for the standard handlers can be provided (e.g. as
public final constants)
- additional extended handlers use the same method to register, only
using the appropriate URI identifier as you suggest.
IMHO this is a cleaner way of registering handlers. I don't have to
remember that one Handler is registered explicitly (setDTDHandler) and
another through
a setProperty call. A Handler isNotA property.
Cheers,
L.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|