[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: John Aldridge <john.aldridge@informatix.co.uk>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2000 11:06:07 +0000
At 12:14 06/01/00 -0800, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> wrote:
>>> Basically, then, the main question was whether the attribute names in
>>> the following two examples are identical:
>>> <html:a href="foo">
>>> <html:a html:href="foo">
>The namespace spec could have said one of three things:
>
>1. These must always be treated as identical
>2. These must always be treated as different
>3. Applications can make up their minds
>
>The then-Working Group eventually went for #3.
The trouble with #3 is that it makes the semantics of an XML document
depend on its consuming application, not its originating application. XML
provides a tool for publishing data so that it can be processed by a wide
range of applications over which the author has no control. These
consuming applications should not, IMHO, have been given the option of
misinterpreting the data in this way.
--
Cheers,
John
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|