Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Stefan Haustein <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Ray Whitmer <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2000 12:02:01 +0100
Ray Whitmer wrote:
> Perhaps the word "unpredictable" might be replaced with "suprising" or "undesirable".
> Level 1 methods preserve level 1 behavior, including where colon may be used as a
> non-namespace-delimiting character. Intermixing level 1 methods with level 2 methods can
> produce quite unexpected results, which are nonetheless strictly predictable from the spec, I
> There are some simple cases where I believe intermixing does work, including:
> 2. If a level 2 parser produces a level 2 DOM hierarchy, always setting the prefixes in
> addition to the namespaceURIs, which is then exclusively traversed and manipulated by a level
> 1 application.
Are you sure? As far as I know, prefixes can have different
bindings at different levels in the hierarchy, manipulating
the tree may result in invalid prefixes in DOM1 and DOM2.
In DOM2 you have a chance to "repair" the prefixes while
writing out the tree since I know the namespace URI....
The methods I was talking about were mainly attribute access
methods. What I would expect is that they use the elment
namespace as a default. In a plain DOM1 situation, the
element has no namespace, and DOM1 behavior is preserved.
But in the current specification this is not fixed. Thus,
the DOM1 read methods will work in most cases, but will
deliver unpredictable results when I have two attributes
with the same local name but different namespaces. That
seems very dangerous to me.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)