[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: roddey@us.ibm.com
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 13:18:12 -0700
>and a program compares them with equals() in Java or == in C++. Most
>people are arguing that the two should be equals()/==, but a few
>people have pointed out that that is a nasty trap for any programmer
>who is not extremely familiar with the Namespaces spec.
>
>My proposed solution is simply to punt: don't introduce a QName class
>in SAX2, and leave such things to higher-level specs, which can
>deal with these as they see fit.
>
I agree with David here. Just spit out the information as strings and leave
it up to the reciever to put it where it feels the best. Don't assume that
people want to 'program in SAX', in my opinion. Its job should be to get
the parms in and get the data out in an API that people can write
generically to, and introduce as little overhead as is reasonable in the
process.
----------------------------------------
Dean Roddey
Software Weenie
IBM Center for Java Technology - Silicon Valley
roddey@us.ibm.com
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|