xml-dev - Re: Great controversies of XML

Re: Great controversies of XML

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

From: Steven Champeon <schampeo@hesketh.com>
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 18:18:49 -0500 (EST)

On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Tim Bray wrote:
> >6. Internal Subsets
> 
> Shouldn't that just be 6. DTDs?

Or, "SGML DTDs vs. Schemae"?

Steve

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Great controversies of XML
  - From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>

References:
- Re: Great controversies of XML
  - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Great controversies of XML
Next by Date: Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form)
Previous by thread: Re: Great controversies of XML
Next by thread: Re: Great controversies of XML
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS