OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Re: Great controversies of XML

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
  • To: Steven Champeon <schampeo@hesketh.com>
  • Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 11:58:03 -0800

Steven Champeon wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Tim Bray wrote:
> > >6. Internal Subsets
> >
> > Shouldn't that just be 6. DTDs?
> Or, "SGML DTDs vs. Schemae"?

Make that "XML" DTDs, since SGML ones (like the HTML 4.0 DTD)
can't work in XML!

I'd actually generalize this:

6. How do I formalize my data models?

DTDs being one choice.  There are several schema based solutions,
as well as a variety of algorithmic ones.

Most tool vendors will gladly explain to you why their tool is
better than all the others, and politely dodge the issue of
which one is better for your particular task ... I'm a huge
believer that there will not be (and should not be) a single
"one size fits all" approach.

If nothing else, I'll point to the way human civilization
evolved over the past millenia to accomodate diversity.
That is, when it's not focussed on wars to eliminate it!
Data modeling has always been a microcosm of that.

- Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS