[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Charlie Kaiman <ckaiman@i3solutions.com>
- To: "'Brandt Dainow'" <bd@internet-etc.com>, "'xml-dev@ic.ac.uk'" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:01:11 -0500
Could someone enlighten us -- or at least me -- on VML/SVG and what is *so*
revolutionary about them? I seen some amazing things done with VRML, but
the VML demos (that I've seen) just don't compare? Is there a difference?
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xml-dev@ic.ac.uk [mailto:owner-xml-dev@ic.ac.uk]On Behalf Of
Brandt Dainow
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2000 8:17 AM
To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Subject: RE: XML for 3D geometry and objects
Maybe - Microsoft have standardized on (and deployed in Office2000) VML. So
now we have VML versus SVG. SVG won't revolutionise anything while 90% of
application users are running VML.
I'm not qualified to take sides, but I don't think we need both.
Brandt Dainow
bd@internet-etc.com
Internet Etc Ltd
http://www.internet-etc.com
Brandt Dainow
bd@internet-etc.com
Internet Etc Ltd
http://www.internet-etc.com
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@ic.ac.uk the message
unsubscribe xml-dev (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
|
