Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Stefan Haustein <email@example.com>
- To: David Megginson <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 13:21:07 +0100
David Megginson wrote:
> The vendors that you list were all pretty quiet during the SAX1
> discussions as well, but they all acted with astoundingly good faith
> afterwards in implementing the API, and put real resources into
> publicising the fact afterwards.
Why should they try to change a system running fine.
Development of SAX at xml-dev with you as a kind of
moderator avoids bad compromises resulting from two
consortium members not willing to give up their
position, ending up with having redundancy in the
standard. SAX is a good standard, and the big
vendors can use it without putting man power and
money into standardization groups...
University of Dortmund
Computer Science VIII