[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
- To: "Edd Dumbill" <edd@usefulinc.com>, "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>, "Dave Hollander" <dmh@commerce.net>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 20:59:28 -0500
From: Dave Hollander <dmh@commerce.net>
> PS. Regarding "heavy" schemas: I do not see why someone could not
> use a sub-set of XML Schemas to achieve a easy to learn and use
> schema language. If anyone has ideas on this application profile,
> let me know.
Such a sub-set could have tremendous utility, both for simplified implementations
and as a means of learning the larger schema.
I think it should be possible, though I have no idea of the effort required, to
define a standard subset roughly equivalent to DTDs. But I suspect such a
standard would have great value.
Bill la Forge
|
