[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Arjun Ray <aray@q2.net>
- To: xml-dev@xml.org
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 08:50:18 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Bill la Forge wrote:
> I think it should be possible, though I have no idea of the effort
> required, to define a standard subset roughly equivalent to DTDs.
Subset?
I have yet to see a demonstration of the premise - that these Schema
thingies actually cover the scope of DTDs. (I've seen the *claim*,
but even after multiple passes through the Newspeak, I can't see how I
would go about verifying it. Multiple attlists? Never mind the
stuff from SGML that XML left *out* - like data attributes.)
I say this new Emperor has no clothes.
Arjun
|
