[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Dave Hollander <dmh@commerce.net>
- To: Matthew Fuchs <matthew.fuchs@commerceone.com>, "'Bill la Forge'" <b.laforge@jxml.com>, Edd Dumbill <edd@usefulinc.com>, "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>, Dave Hollander <dmh@commerce.net>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 15:33:16 -0700
Sorry for the confusion. I intended the concept from the
view point of learning to use XML Schemas. I personally would
not like to see the parser industry design to a sub-set.
I agree that bifurcating the schema world now would be a
"bad" thing.
As I talk with those who advocating "simpler schemas", I
will have to be more careful with my words to make that
point clear.
Regards,
Dave Hollander
At 11:48 AM 2/11/00 -0800, Matthew Fuchs wrote:
>Standardizing such a thing makes me extremely nervous at this point. The
>value of a standard is only that it is standard - xsdl hasn't even been
>finalized and we're already talking about bifurcating it. ...
__________________________________________________________
Dave Hollander
Director eCommerce Knowledge Management and Interoperability
CommerceNet
Co-chair W3C XML Schema Working Group
dmh@commerce.net
970-613-0605
__________________________________________________________
|