[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
- To: "Wang,David" <dwang@mitre.org>, <haustein@kimo.cs.uni-dortmund.de>, "XML-Dev Mailing list" <xml-dev@xml.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 12:40:01 -0500
This sounds somewhat analagous to C++ templates. And aren't templates being
used (pizza?) with Java as well?
> I am no authority on this, but this is my understanding:
> OOP classes binds "elements and types" together as one (implicitly), whereas
> in XML Schema they are actually separated, so all elements have to have a
> type or datatype. Thus, you'd have to build up a type-hierarchy alongside
> an element one, depending on how you want to use it.
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************
|
