[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: Michael Fuller <msf@io.mds.rmit.edu.au>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 17:16:26 -0500 (EST)
Michael Fuller writes:
> Question: in both cases, should the raw name of the xmlns attribute be
> "xmlns:h", not "xmlns"? Particularly in the false/true case, this seems the
> only way to be able to faithfully recreate the original XML 1.0 document...
Right -- thanks for catching the typo.
> Aside: I note that the JavaDoc of the Attributes interface refers to
> the "raw-names" feature and "http://xml.org/sax/features/raw-names",
> not namespace-prefixes.
I fixed that in time for beta2.
> Aside 2: The _SAX2: Features and Properties_ document doesn't specify
> the defaults for the listed core features; however, other documents,
> such as _Namespace Support_ and the JavaDoc do talk about default values.
> Perhaps an extra line should be added to the description of each feature
> stating its default value?
Good suggestion.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************
|