[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
- To: Arjun Ray <aray@q2.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 12:07:19 -0800
Arjun Ray wrote:
>
> > RDF should be an "architecture" not a "framework". RDF should
> > have a DTD
>
> Isn't the doctrine - think the right think - from 50000 ft to kill off
> DTDs?
One would have to wonder about the philosophy of any organization
which is trying to "kill off" a solution that's been working quite
well for a decade or so ... in evident favor of approaches which are
at best still in development and don't have anything like the same
degre of proof-in-practice.
Any "right think" shouldn't involve sticks (killing), but carrots.
Any "right think" needs to accept that the solution for one problem
may not be an appropriate solution for a different problem.
- Dave
p.s. My point doesn't relate to RDF or RDF DTDs at all.
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************
|
