[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: xml-dev <xml-dev@xml.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 10:48:00 -0500 (EST)
Elliotte Rusty Harold writes:
> Even accepting that "import java.net.*" is bad form, doesn't
> absolve us of the responsibility to avoid the problem in the first
> place.
Not completely absolved, granted, but if programmers use java.net.*
they're really setting themselves up for this. What happens if the
next Java release also contains a java.net.InputSource class (for
example), or a java.net.Locator class? Will we have to put out
revised a SAX3/Java just to change those names as well?
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************
|
