[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Don Park" <donpark@docuverse.com>
- To: "'Jon Ferraiolo'" <jferraio@Adobe.COM>
- Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 04:26:53 -0800
Jon Ferraiolo wrote:
>As I remember, we decided against a syntax with coordinates as
>character data because we wanted character data only for things
>that were textual in nature (such as <text> elements).
Now this is interesting. Do you recall WHY the WG wanted to use
character data only for things that were textual in nature? I
am not being critical here. I just sense a gem of wisdom I do
not yet have. I am intrigued.
>These comments have been made in the desire to be candid and
>truthful about what is likely to happen. Would you prefer instead
>that I set up expectations incorrectly, or perhaps that the
>comments were left unanswered?
No. I am not placing the blame on you. I am disappointed with
the likely turn of events you are predicting. Your responses are
appreciated still.
>I do not recall any feedback comments to the first last call about
>the 'path' element.
I accept my share of the blame. Like everyone else, I was (and am)
under an endless avalanche of specs to read.
Best,
Don Park - mailto:donpark@docuverse.com
Docuverse - http://www.docuverse.com
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|