[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Ken MacLeod <ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us>
- To: xml-dev@xml.org
- Date: 09 Mar 2000 10:30:29 -0600
David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> writes:
> > Ken MacLeod <ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us> writes:
> >
> > > The Perl SAX binding has used what I believe to be a very
> > > powerful technique that I'd like to propose for SAX 2.0:
> > >
> > > Event handlers should be passed a DOM node instead of
> > > positional parameters.
>
> Seems to me that this is exactly what you'd get if you
> listened for the right type of mutation events on the
> root node of the DOM tree as it's being populated.
>
> No new API needed -- DOM L2 has such callbacks today.
That's a good point, is the SAX API needed if a similar API exists?
<me ducks="1"/>
The biggest difference I think would be that SAX (generally) would use
"unattached" nodes in a push, start/end, mode.
-- Ken
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
