[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 06:18:50 -0500 (EST)
David Brownell writes:
> > > At this point my preferred resolution would be to say (a) PE
> > > inclusion MUST NOT be reported, (b) declarations in the DTD may be
> > > reported in any order. I could go either way on (b) but it seems
> > > least trouble overall.
> >
> > I'd love (b) as well.
>
> Then let's consider (b) resolved for SAX2.
Not so simple -- if there's going to be a record of the internal
vs. external subset, then we either need to add an isInternal flag to
each declaration or at least partition the declarations into two
groups (which is a very rudimentary ordering).
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|