[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Steve Rowe <sarowe@textwise.com>
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2000 20:16:55 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> At 01:09 AM 4/8/00 -0400, Steven Rowe wrote:
> >Is it not ironic that Common XML, an attempt to increase interoperability,
> >excludes PIs, which are likely to be the mechanism which will be proposed
> >to express document feature requirements, another attempt to increase
> >interoperability.
>
> It would be ironic, except that Common XML doesn't exclude PIs. It just
> keeps them out of the core set of safely interoperable features.
Please forgive my ignorance; Common XML *Core* excludes PIs. It appears
that you've intentionally left the boundary between XML and Common XML
fuzzy, if not altogether invisible. Of course Common XML doesn't exclude
anything in XML. It *is* XML.
If CXML is intended to partition XML features, the naming scheme needs
work.
Steve Rowe
MNIS-TextWise Labs
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|