[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Don Park" <donpark@docuverse.com>
- To: "'Box, Don'" <dbox@develop.com>, <xml-dev@xml.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 16:27:36 -0700
I have to agree with Don Box here. We do not want to
replace XML-DEV with 5-10 different lists. Mailing lists
like SML-DEV are harmless because they represent the side
streets while XML-DEV represents the town square. If we
are to move XML-DEV again, I think we must do two things
to ensure its survival:
1. It must be the last move.
This translates to using XML-DEV specific domain name.
Both xml-dev.org (by Andrew Layman) and xmldev.org are
taken (most likely reserved to protect XML-DEV).
2. Peter must lead the move.
To prevent the patient from dying during the trip, we
need Peter to act as the Pied Piper.
Even if OASIS comes through, I think we should go ahead
with #1 so the subscribers can slowly migrate over to
an address independent of the hosting organization.
Best,
Don Park - mailto:donpark@docuverse.com
Docuverse - http://www.docuverse.com
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
